A size-based model for a fish stock assessment

1Saang-Yoon Hyun, 1Jinwoo Gim, and 2Kyuhan Kim


1 Pukyong National University (Busan, Korea)
2 Victoria University of Wellington (Wellington, New Zealand)

4 ~ 8 Nov. 2019

CAPAM workshop
Wellington, New Zealand

Motivation
Some biology of the chub mackerel  
Available data for the chub mackerel

Yields from a purse seine fishery and its CPUE in 1996-2017
Body lengths from 2000-2017;   Body weights from 2005-2017

Objectives
Some history of length-based models, and our model
Length-based model
  1. Recruitment. We defined it as age-1 fish.
  2. Body length, treated as a discrete random variable ~ a normal (Gaussian) probability.
  3. The mean and variance of body lengths at recruitment (i.e., age-1 fish) were known:   i.e., \(\mu_1\) and \(\sigma^2_1\) were given as input values.

    However, the mean and the variance of lengths at the other age-\(a\) fish (i.e., \(\mu_a\) and \(\sigma^2_a\), where \(a\) > 1) are estimated in the model.
Mortality and body growth of an imaginary cohort


Mortality and body growth of an imaginary cohort


Prob(lengths) after ‘1st mortality and then 2nd growth’
  1. Length distribuiton at recruitment:   \(P_{y,a=1}(x) = \text{discrete } N(\mu_1,\; \sigma^2_1)\)

  2. After mortality (at the end of age \(a\)):   \(P_{y,a, Z}(x) = P_{y,a}(x)\cdot \text{exp}(M+F_{y}(x))\)

  3. After one growth increment from an individual of length \(x\) to length \(L\):
    \[ \color{blue}P_{y+1,a+1}(L|x) = \text{discrete } N(\mu_{a+1}(x),\; \sigma^2_{a+1}) \]
  4. Finally after both mortality and growth,
    \[ P_{y+1,a+1}(L) = \sum_{x}^{} P_{y,a,Z}(x) \cdot \color{blue}P_{y+1,a+1}(L|x) \] \[\because \color{blue}P_{y+1,a+1}(L|x) =\frac{P(L_{y+1,a+1}, \; x_{y,a})} {P_{y,a,Z}(x)} \]

Then, \(P_{y+1, a+1}(L) => P_{y+1, a+1}(x)\), and steps of (2) ~ (4) are repeated over imaginary ages, or along an imaginary cohort.

The growth process


where

\(x_{a+1} = h(L_\infty, \color{red}\rho, x_a) + \varepsilon\),   and   \(\varepsilon \text{ ~ } N(0,\color{red}{\sigma^2_x})\)

The other parts

Year- and length- fishing mortality:   \(F_{y}(x)=\text{sel}\cdot F_{y} = \text{logistic}(x, \color{red} \gamma,\color{red} {L_{0.5}})\cdot\color{red} q\cdot \text{effort}_y\)
                     
The number of age-\(a\) fish at length \(x\) after mortality:   \(N_{y,a,Z}(x) = N_{y,a} \cdot P_{y,a,Z}(x)\)

Catch at age \(a\) and length \(x\):   \(C_{y,a}(x)=N_{y,a} \cdot P_{y,a}(x) \cdot\frac{F_y(x)}{Z_y(x)}\cdot (1-\text{exp}(-Z_y(x)))\)

Biomass and yield at age \(a\):   \[B_{y,a}=\sum_{x}^{} N_{y,a}(x)\cdot W(x), \; \; \text{and} \; \; Y_{y,a}=\sum_{x}^{} C_{y,a}(x)\cdot W(x)\]                           where \(W(x)\) = body weight at length \(x\).

A total of 27 free parameters, and \(M\)

\(q\): catchability in the fishing mortality function

\(\gamma\) and \(L_{0.5}\): two parameters in the selection (logistic) equation

\(\color{red}\rho\) and \(\sigma^2_x\): two parameters in the growth equations (Cohen and Fishman; LVB)

\(\mathbf N_1\): 22 annual abundances at recruitment (i.e., in 22 years).

\(M\): natural mortality was not treated as a free parameter but its estimate was found with a sensitivity analysis.

Parameters, treated as input values
Objective function: \(Obj\)

\(\mathbf m_y\), length frequency data in year, \(y\):     \(\mathbf m_y\) ~ Multinomial(\(n_y\), \(\mathbf o_j\))

\(Y_y\), yield data in year, \(y\):     \(\text{log} Y_y\) ~ \(N(\mu_{\text{log}Y_y}\), \(\sigma^2_{\text{log}Y})\)


\(\therefore Obj = -1.0\cdot \bigl[D_1 \cdot \text{log}L(\boldsymbol\theta|\mathbf m_y) + D_2 \cdot \text{log}L(\boldsymbol\theta | \text{log}Y_y) \bigr]\)

where \(D_1\) and \(D_2\) are data weights.

It turned out that \(D_1\) = 0.05, and \(D_2\) = 10.0.

Model validation
Model validation

Model validation in fitted vs. observed yield values

Model validation in fitted vs. observed length frequency


Model validation in fitted vs. observed length frequency


Estimates

Considering year-to-year variability in length-weight data

Considering year-to-year variability in length-weight data

Considering year-to-year variability in length-weight data

Considering year-to-year variability in length-weight data
Ongoing work with Multifan-CL
Ongoing work with Multifan-CL: Estimation of age compositions
Ongoing work with Multifan-CL: Estimation of age compositions
Plan
Acknowledgements

Late Dr. Terry Quinn’s visit at May 2016
Financial support: National Research Foundation of Korea
Data: (Korea) National Institute of Fisheries Sciences
Map: Doyul Kim
Mackerel image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chub_mackerel
Thank you.

Supplementary materials

Estimation of age compositions, applying one of the Multifan modules